new hydrogen torch & fuel for car gasoline save money
these are the shots i filmed with another camera. i’ve since integrated this high pressure hydrogen system with my on demand system to succesfully operate a car for long periods of time. i currently have 3 ebooks i sell on ebay under the user name powerzap69. or you can email me at powerzap69@yahoo.com for more info they explain all the info i have gathered so far on hydrogen. i also have several other ebooks on alternative energy sources like solar thermal, wind power. and generating …
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
scrap aluminum, which to be reused or recycled uses alot of energy. so i found a new use for it where it creates energy instead. and yes they can now reuse whats left over
Cool stuff, but are you using aluminium for a reactant ? takes a lot of energy to make that. Did u see knowpup’s demonstration on making H2 where the leftovers actually are an in demand product (according to knowpup )
you need to think of this system along the lines as a propane conversion. but unfortunatly you cannot use a propane set up. pressure is too low with propane compared to this. now a chambered system with a rotating assembly to seperate the solids from the liquids is what i’ve been trying to devise.
both top notch questions. the chemical is never spent in reality. just the solids its reacting with. there is a small loss. but mostly due to boiling into the line. but i have a salution for that. and that salution makes this system better then most out there. and yes you can install several types of shut off valves. N.O.S. makes one that will twist the top valve on most std bottles electrically. made for race cars. but i always recomend more then one shut off.
One other question. Does the reaction continue until all the chemical is spent, or can you turn off the valve and turn it on again later?
Hmm… It shouldn’t be too hard to rig a second valve to the accelerator pedal. You obviously don’t have to worry about a pump. Damn, you got my gears turning! I think the wife is gonna be PISSED! LOL!
my first tank was an aluminum co2 tank. maybey not quit as thick as i said but still thiock. second tank was a nitrogen tank. then i finally settled with a steel scuba tank. which is rated for high pressure for deep water. but i got the best reaction out of the first tank.
OK. Now WHERE do you get such a tank? Even welding tanks aren’t that thick. It sounds a bit costly.
be very carefull with anything small like that. the sides are to weak to handle the corrosive chemicals and heat. the bottles i use are close to an inch thick. after a certain point the chemical will no longer react with the insides. something ceramic lined would be ideal for long term. but i try to use bottles rated for over 5000 psi for safety. my reaction is extreme. the nice thing about it is you dont have to add chemicals very often. they wont dissapate unless they boil over
Hey, Steve. Have you tried smaller bottles like maybe 20 oz CO2 tanks used for paintball. Maybe line a few of them up to create the same gas in a smaller unit.
LOL!
WOW!!! that’s a new concept. now the only thing that puzzles me is this??? your a scientist correct? and instead of referring to the reaction as “electrolysis” you say “steam” what 4th world nation are you from? and excactly how long ago did indoor plumbing become the newest craze around there?
hey im lone private scientist and i founded other way how to ride cars without burning gas and im willing to share it:
get a bucket of water and take + and - cord that goes to battery and put it in bucket of water, then take to 2 tubes that goes to ur engine in put them in bucket and cover that bucket very tight becasue it is going to steam and on that steam you can use 1 gallon of gas per like 200 miles.
ah i see. well heres the bottom line with me. i’m no scientist. i have a difficult time understanding the text book end of all of this. what i am is someone who very easily turned a bunch of scrap metal into usable energy at a very small cost to my pocket book. since our discussion started i’ve helped alot of people both locally and afar reach the same goal. i helped one friend cut up 5 cars with nothing but hydrogen and oxygen. out of pocket fuel cost? 10 bucks then normal oxygen cost
to buggar 4466 who thought my explination of weighing the product gas beeing “…not accurate and is too lenghty”
Why even bother to measure a substance (gas) if you cannot be sure of the purity and pressure (amongst other things)…
i’m not understanding what this is in response too?
yes except for one thing, hydrogen is lighter then air. its power to mass or weight ration is very little when measured like that. but the power to volume ration is incredible. you can compress hydrogen to an unlimited amount. its the gas they use to perform experiments under extreme pressures with for stabilising the enviroment. the big 3 automakers want to use 400 bar pressurised containers in new cars. all they are doing is requiring you to have to use a service station.
My explanation is not accurate? Since when does going from vacuum to 100% of the gas wanted being inaccurate…?
Rather that then guessing all the air have been blown away.
what kind of question is that? i’m not trying to sell the torch. its a tool used with another process. this video is to show that everyday items can be used with this system for a much cheaper and eviromentally clean way.
did you make or buy that torch?
i stand corrected. i should have done my research before assuming. but i thank you because it spurred me to do alot more research on hydrogen. thanks for the insight.
not really, it actually stablises at that pressure. the reaction i use actually produces very little oxygen. its only dangerouse if the container bursts or is introduced with a spark internally. there are ways to protect for both. automakers want to use containers pressurised to 400 bar multiply that by 16 and you have your psi. personally i feel thats more dangerouse then what i’m doing
by putting a container under a vacuum your actually lowering the boiling point of the water. thats why you vacuum out your air conditioner unit pryor to charging it. and there is a difference between boiling water and actually seperating the two molicules. water vapor is still water. dont get me wrong. its good for a motor because it reduces carbon build up. its just not the same affect.
i’m not using electricity. i’m strictly using a chemical base reaction to seperate the h2o and turning it into hho. my new design uses this in conjuntion with a low amp drawing on demand system which does two things. first it rinses the harmfull chemicals from the high pressure system and second uses those chemicals to help produce more in the on demand unit. so you have the best of both worlds. try hydrogen peroxide to reduce the build up on your plates. its amazing the difference it makes
Your the one incorrect. Hydrogen has an octane rating of 130. He was right. Higher octane fuel does not have “more” stabilizers, it has , on average, longer hydrocarbon (or heavier) on average. Low octane gas has on average must shorter (or lighter) hydrocarbon chains. Cyclic rings like Toluene, Napthalene, Benzene, and others raise octane dramatically since they are heavier. He was only wrong with “amount of octane”, Octane (the eight carbon chain) is not in play. Its just a nomenclature.